Andreas Haider-Maurer vs Amar Zubcevic Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L L W L W L
Form
W L L L L L L L L LHead-To-Head: Haider-Maurer 1 - 0 Zubcevic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Haider-Maurer winning 2 and Zubcevic winning 0. The last match between Haider-Maurer and Zubcevic was at the Austria F6, 18-07-2005, First, Clay with Andreas Haider-Maurer getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Andreas Haider-Maurer | 1 |
| Amar Zubcevic | 0 |
Austria F6(18-07-2005)
6
1
6
3
| Haider-Maurer | Stats | Zubcevic |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 47 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 38 | Age | 40 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 18 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (447-336) | Career Total W/L | 27% (9-24) |
| $723,565 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Haider-Maurer VS Zubcevic H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 | |||||
Haider-Maurer VS Zubcevic H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Andreas Haider-Maurer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
72)
2
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Mikhail Balmashev
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alen Avidzba
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
51%
(
42 of
83)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
4
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
9
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
34 of
39)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Arthur De Greef
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve %
49%
(
17 of
35)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
31
Total Points Won
24
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
37 of
77)
4
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
17 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
George Von Massow
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
42%
(
35 of
84)
12
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
53 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
12
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
38%
(
18 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
George Von Massow
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
10
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jonathan Kanar
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
4
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
7
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
54 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
121)
130
Total Points Won
121
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Amar Zubcevic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (447/336) | Win/Loss | 27% (9/24) |
| 55% (1014/820) | Sets Win/Loss | 30% (21/50) |
| 52% (9025/8382) | Games Win/Loss | 43% (293/384) |
| 54% (61/53) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) |
| 62% (325/199) | Clay Win/Loss | 13% (2/14) |
| 43% (54/71) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (3/6) |
| 35% (7/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 2765 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 1955 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 109.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 362.3 |
| 57% (19661/34263) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 73% (14326/19661) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (6796/14602) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (1299/3117) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (12350/32149) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (23/29) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 23% (3/10) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (6/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 39% (47/72) | Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (247/162) | Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 68% (121/58) | Futures W/L | 26% (7/20) |
| 58% (427/733) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 27% (9/33) |
| 36% (14/39) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (130/264) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (5/11) |
| 55% (124/224) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 86% (441/380) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (9/7) |
| 14% (441/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (9/2) |
| 20% (342/68) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (24/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
